4.5 (520) In stock
In late January, Thinx, Inc. announced that it had reached a $5 million settlement agreement to end Dickens v. Thinx, Inc., a class action perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS/PFOA) lawsuit. Thinx will provide up to $5 million to reimburse consumers who bought the company’s signature period underwear between November 12, 2016 and November 28, 2022. To put this in perspective, reimbursements are limited to $7.00 per pair (up to 3 pairs) for consumers who still have receipts and $3.50 per pair (same limit) for those who do not. The initial purchase price of these undies runs up to $35.00 per pair.
Thinx, Inc. to Settle PFAS/PFOA Lawsuit
Thinx 'non-toxic' period panties settles $5M lawsuit over harmful chemicals
PFAS LIABILITIES: FOREVER CHEMICALS FACE GLOBAL TRIBUNAL - CAC Specialty
Thinx Settled a Lawsuit Claiming Its Period Underwear Contains Potentially Harmful Chemicals
PFAS LIABILITIES: FOREVER CHEMICALS FACE GLOBAL TRIBUNAL - CAC Specialty
PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - ABC News
PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary
PFAS in clothing: What you need to know
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
Inside the Race to Get Forever Chemicals Out of Raincoats - BNN Bloomberg
PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary
The new generation of 'forever chemicals' – toxicity, exposure, contamination and regulation
Australian government reaches $132.7m class action settlement with landowners over Pfas contamination, PFAS
PFAS Lawsuit Maxwell Law Group
