4.7 (659) In stock
Victoria’s Secret’s parent company is facing legal action – not for the bra and underwear designs it is being called out for swiping from ex-employee Jennifer Zuccarini’s label Fleur du Mal – but instead, for allegedly violating federal securities laws by making “materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects,” thereby, causing investors to pay “artificially inflated prices for L Brands common stock,” only to have stock prices fall late last year, and throughout this year, as well.
Prince Harry's lawyer implicates Rupert Murdoch in cover-up of
Victoria's Secret, Under Siege, Lays Off Employees at Headquarters
TFL, Author at The Fashion Law - Page 34 of 201
These charts show why Victoria's Secret fired its angels — and why
Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner, 82, 'mocked idea of
US charges Boeing with misleading investors on 737 MAX
Edward Razek, Victoria's Secret Parent's Longtime Marketing Chief
Meet new generation Zillennial investors TikTok shaking stock
Victoria's Secret Goes Private as L Brands CEO Steps Down
Trump's US$5 billion Truth Social deal greenlit by investors
